Electoral Area “F” LWMP

Overview

Under provincial legislation (Environmental Management Act) the Regional District can develop a Liquid Waste Management Plan (LWMP) to accommodate existing or future development with a strategy that ensures the management, resource recovery and disposal of treated waste is sufficiently protective of public health and the environment. 

This is considered to be an economical and effective method of providing a comprehensive plan for managing a community’s liquid waste. 

Background

In 1994, the RDOS Board approved what was then referred to as a Wastewater Management Plan for the communities of West Bench (Electoral Area “F”) and Naramata (Electoral Area “E”): 

Electoral Area “F” (West Bench) Wastewater Management Plan (1994) 

Stage 1 Report 

Map 

Stage 2 Report 

Map 

Stage 3 Report 

Map 

The impetus for these plans was the Okanagan Basin Study (1974) which identified residential onsite sewage disposal systems located in areas adjacent to water sources, or in permeable soils in areas of high groundwater, as a source for significant phosphorous transmissions to Okanagan Lake. 

Following the declaration of the Okanagan Valley as an environmentally sensitive area in the 1980s, a series of Wastewater Management Plans (WWMP) were initiated, including those for West Bench and Naramata. 

Greata Ranch Amendment (2009)

The Greata Ranch property comprises multiple legal titles east of Highway 97 and bounded by Okanagan Lake representing several hectares of land that have generally been zoned for medium and low density residential uses since the 1990s (if not earlier).  

Even at low intensities, this zoning would allow for 75 to 90 units on the site, while the medium density zoning could allow for a total capacity of over 300 units. 

To address this development capacity of the site, an amendment to the Electoral Area “F” WWMP was completed in 2009 in order to establish a preferred option for the management of wastewater for the proposed Greata Ranch development, specifically; pumping sanitary sewage waste to a wastewater treatment facility located in Summerland.  

The length of the forcemain required to connect Greata Ranch and Summerland would be approximately 11 kilometres, depending on the final connection location.  This sewer extension would have the added benefit of permitting the connection of several nodes along the lakeshore between Greata Ranch and Summerland (e.g. Okanagan Lake Provincial Park, Lombardy Bay and, what was referred to at the time as “Tranquil Bay”). 

 

In February of 2009, Summerland Council resolved to support this option, in principle and subject to normal development conditions and requirements for the connection to and use of the District of Summerland’s infrastructure and utilities.  

The RDOS Board passed a resolution that they approved the preferred option and the Stage 2 report on April 2, 2009. 

Electoral Area “F” (West Bench) Wastewater Management Plan Amendment (2009)
Stage 1 Report / Map  Stage 2 Report / Map  Stage 3 Report / Map

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does the Liquid Waste Management Plan (LWMP) require the construction of a sewer main extension to Summerland’s sewer system? 

A: No, the LWMP does not, by itself, require a sewer main extension be constructed to Summerland’s sewer system, however, such a requirement may be imposed by: 

  1. the Regional District Board through the creation of a sewer service area or as a condition of rezoning approval; or 

  2. the Provincial Approving Officer as a condition of subdivision approval. 

In considering such a requirement, the Regional District Board or Provincial Approving Officer may take a number of factors into consideration, such as: 

  • the cost of constructing the pipeline; 

  • the views of the District of Summerland; or 

  • any regulatory requirement concerning sewage management.  

LWMP Review

The Regional District is aware that it is considered good practice to review a Liquid Waste Management Plan (LWMP) every 5-10 years or if any of the following circumstances apply: 

  • if significant inflation has occurred since the plan was adopted; 

  • when circumstances have changed significantly from when the original plan was developed; or 

  • if a significant time elapses between plan development and implementation. 

In recognition that many of the above considerations apply to the Greata Ranch area, and that Greata Ranch is being removed as a “Rural Growth Area” under the South Okanagan Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Bylaw (as of 2023), the Regional District is aware that a review of the Electoral Area “F” WWMP is warranted.